How many people actually pay
Inheritance tax is a minority event at death. In 2023-24, 30,400 estates were taxed out of 644,000 UK deaths, so 95.28% of deaths created no charge at all (HMRC, 30 July 2026). The number of taxpaying estates actually fell by 1,100 on the year, even as the taxed share of deaths rose, because total deaths fell faster.
| Measure, tax year | 2022-23 | 2023-24 |
| Taxpaying estates (UK) | 31,500 | 30,400 |
| UK deaths | 683,000 | 644,000 |
| Taxed share of deaths | 4.62% | 4.72% |
| Total IHT liability | £6.70bn | £7.03bn |
| Average effective rate | n/a | 13% |
Source: HMRC Inheritance Tax liabilities statistics commentary, 30 July 2026. UK.
The 4.72% taxed share is the highest since 2006-07, when it was 5.96% (HMRC, 30 July 2026). The direction of travel is upward: the Institute for Fiscal Studies projected the taxed share reaching around 7% by 2032-33 if thresholds stayed frozen (IFS, September 2023), and the Office for Budget Responsibility forecasts UK receipts rising from £8.7 billion in 2025-26 to £14.7 billion by 2030-31 (OBR, November 2025).
Two series, do not merge. Liabilities are the tax created on estates of people who died in a given tax year, published later by HMRC. Receipts are cash HMRC collects in a financial year, often months after death. The IFS projection predates the Autumn Budget 2025 freeze extension and the pension and relief reforms, so it is directional rather than a current official forecast.
Who pays, by estate size
The payers cluster around the top of the wealth distribution, but the tax does not simply rise in lockstep with estate value. The average effective rate climbs from 4% on estates of £300,000 to £400,000, reaches 25% on estates of £2 million to £7.5 million, and then falls back to 18% on estates over £10 million (HMRC, 30 July 2026). The turning point is the signature of reliefs, which are concentrated in the very largest estates.
| Net estate value band | Taxpaying estates | Average tax per estate | Average effective rate |
| £300,000 to £400,000 | 2,300 | £13,800 | 4% |
| £1m to £1.5m | 7,770 | £151,000 | 12% |
| £1.5m to £2m | 2,930 | £324,000 | 19% |
| £2m to £7.5m | n/a | n/a | 25% |
| £7.5m to £10m | n/a | n/a | 23% |
| Over £10m | 220 | £4.72m | 18% |
Source: HMRC Inheritance Tax liabilities statistics commentary, 30 July 2026, Figure 3 and value-band tables. UK. Cells marked "n/a" are not published as single figures in the released commentary.
The estate that pays the highest effective rate is not the largest one. An estate around £3 million made mostly of a home and investments has little to shelter and can face close to the headline treatment on its taxable slice, while a much larger estate holding a qualifying trading business or farmland can carry a materially lower effective rate. The 220 estates over £10 million still paid the most in cash, £4.72 million each on average (HMRC, 30 July 2026).
Limitation. The average effective rate for each band is a mean and conceals a wide spread within the band. The over-£10 million band contains a small number of estates, so its average is sensitive to a handful of very large or heavily-relieved estates in any single year.
Who pays, by age and gender
Inheritance tax is overwhelmingly a tax on the estates of the very old. Estates of people who died aged 85 or over paid £3.97 billion in 2023-24, 56% of the £7.03 billion total, and those aged 75 to 84 paid a further £1.87 billion, 27% (HMRC, 30 July 2026). Together, estates of people aged 75 and over paid 83% of all inheritance tax. That pattern is consistent with much of the tax falling on the second death of a couple, after the spouse exemption has deferred any charge on the first.
| Group | IHT liability, 2023-24 | Share of total |
| Died aged 85 or over | £3.97bn | 56% |
| Died aged 75 to 84 | £1.87bn | 27% |
| Died under 75 or age unknown | £1.20bn | 17% |
| Male-owned estates | £3.53bn | 50% |
| Female-owned estates | £3.49bn | 50% |
Source: HMRC Inheritance Tax liabilities statistics commentary, 30 July 2026. UK. Shares are of the £7.03 billion total; figures are rounded, so age shares sum to 100% only approximately.
The gender split is close to even in cash terms, £3.53 billion from male-owned estates against £3.49 billion from female-owned, yet the average female-owned taxpaying estate was smaller, at £1.2 million against £1.4 million for male-owned estates (HMRC, 30 July 2026). A near-equal total from smaller average estates implies a larger number of taxpaying female-owned estates, again pointing to longevity and the second death.
Definition. HMRC classifies estates as male-owned or female-owned by the sex of the deceased. The category does not capture jointly held wealth during life, and the second-death interpretation is an inference from the age and exemption data, not a figure HMRC states directly.
Who pays, by region
Inheritance tax is concentrated in the higher-value housing markets of southern England. London and the South East together raised 46% of all UK inheritance tax in 2023-24 from 11,120 taxpaying estates, and 55% of England's total (HMRC, 30 July 2026). The North East, Wales and Northern Ireland had the fewest taxpaying estates, which HMRC attributes to lower property values.
| Region | Taxpaying estates, 2023-24 | Tax charged | Average per estate |
| South East | 6,310 | £1.83bn | ~£290,000 |
| London | 4,810 | £1.43bn | £297,000 |
| London + South East | 11,120 | 46% of UK total | n/a |
| Lowest: North East, Wales, N. Ireland | Fewest of any areas | Lowest shares | n/a |
Source: HMRC Inheritance Tax liabilities statistics commentary, 30 July 2026. Regional figures are by the deceased's region of residence. The South East average is derived from £1.83bn over 6,310 estates; the London average is as published.
Because the tax-free bands are identical nationwide while house prices are not, a frozen threshold bites hardest where property is dearest. The average house price in England was £292,000 in October 2025, close to the £325,000 nil-rate band that has not changed since April 2009 (HM Land Registry UK HPI, October 2025). This is a geographic feature of fiscal drag, not a policy aimed at any region.
Limitation. Region reflects the deceased's place of residence, not necessarily where the assets sit. Regional counts are rounded by HMRC and can move year to year with a small number of very large estates. The South East average shown is derived, not a published HMRC figure.
What keeps most people out, and cuts the top rate
The reason so few estates pay, and the reason the largest pay a lower effective rate, is the same: allowances, exemptions and reliefs. The spouse and civil partner exemption alone removed £6.8 billion from charge across 5,560 estates in 2023-24, up 14% on the year (HMRC, 30 July 2026). Charitable gifts removed a further £1.94 billion across 10,400 estates.
| Exemption or relief | Value removed from charge, 2023-24 | Estates using it |
| Spouse / civil partner exemption | £6.8bn | 5,560 |
| Business property relief (BPR) | £3.85bn | 4,060 |
| Agricultural property relief (APR) | £2.11bn | 2,140 |
| Charitable transfers | £1.94bn | 10,400 |
Source: HMRC Inheritance Tax liabilities statistics commentary, 30 July 2026. UK.
Business and agricultural reliefs are concentrated among large estates, which is why the effective rate turns down above £7.5 million. The Institute for Fiscal Studies has estimated that around 90% of business assets receiving relief are passed on in estates worth over £2 million (IFS, September 2023). Both reliefs are being restricted: from 6 April 2026, agricultural and business property relief give 100% relief on the first £2,500,000 of combined qualifying assets per person and 50% above that, an allowance transferable between spouses and civil partners up to £5,000,000 per couple (gov.uk, 23 December 2025).
Accuracy note. The £2,500,000 relief allowance announced on 23 December 2025 replaced an earlier £1,000,000 allowance announced at the Autumn Budget 2024. Some gov.uk pages dated 30 October 2024 still show the superseded £1,000,000 figure and describe the allowance as not transferable. The current, transferable £2,500,000 figure is used here.